A great number of teenagers have recently spent more time following online videos on Facebook, Tiktok, Youtube and other online platforms. Some people say that young people may be greatly affected by these videos. What do you think of the effects of online videos on teenagers?
Nowadays, without a shadow of a doubt, the videos on Facebook, Youtube, Tiktok and other online platforms have become a popular trend among teenagers. I believe that the videos on those platforms have both positive and adverse impacts on teenagers for the following reasons.
On the bright side, online platforms can provide teenagers with entertaining videos after stressful hours at school. These videos can also bring teenagers a vast amount of knowledge ranging from science, technology to the most basic life skills. Also, they can inspite teens with new hobbies and interests such as cooking, making crafts, doing DIY, etc. What’s more, teenagers will also be kept posted about national and international events. For example, during the coronavirus crisis, by watching news reports on Facebook, teenagers can know about the number of cases that are identified positive in their country as well as precations to protect themselves and their families.
On the other hand, the videos on Facebook, Youtube, Tiktok can negatively affect teens’ behaviour. As they do not have adequate knowledge and experiences, teenagers can easily be lured by videos that contain bad content such as violence, crime, sex and social evils, which can ruin their future door. Apart from these, these videos can be addictive. As aformentioned, the videos on online platform are a great source of entertainment, so teenagers may be too immersed in the virtual world that they will lack face-to-face interaction with others and neglect their studies.
To recaptulate, the videos on online plateforms have both postive and negative impacts on teenagers. Therefore, it is important that parents take control over the time teens spent on thse videos and teens should also be alert when using these.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | Phan Thi Hai Anh | 44 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32624113475 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68234226229 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4602977521 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33865979043 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125218637523 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574176461004 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215330950795 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472881960217 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.