The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided two pictures compare the layout of a town named Kimsville as it was in 2002 with its current state.
Overall, it is apparent that the town has become a more vibrant and modern place compared to the past with the introduction of various facilities.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 2002, there used to be a factory and an old cinema situated to the east and south of the town center respectively. Nevertheless, at the present, they have been pulled down and converted into a software company and a pub. Another remarkable change to the town has been the construction of a new train station to the west of the central area.
It is interesting to note that Kimsville had no residential area in 2002; however, new apartments have been erected to the northwest of the area nowadays. Trees scattered around to the southwest, meanwhile, have been chopped down, with a football stadium taking their place. Finally, no changes have been made to the original shopping center.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-15 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-10 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-12-05 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
Essays by user Drake004 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, nevertheless, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82456140351 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75555903057 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4418265939 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0872108438821 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391658948336 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274743014945 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534037283191 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196477526349 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.