universal risk-taking personalities
The reading and the lecture are both about “universal risk-taking personalities”. According to the reading people with this type of personality injure themselves with no reason and their behaviors must be considered illogical and in extreme forms pathological. However, the lecture challenges all the claims that the reading considers saying that the article was written many years ago and the perspective is no longer valid in the psychological field.
First, the reading establishes that risk-taking personalities are indicative of suicidal personalities. Nevertheless, the professor shows that risk takers' personalities have no relationship with suicidal tendencies. Moreover, he says that nowadays risk-taking personalities are considered positive skills attitudes.
Second of all, the paper states that risk-taking personalities endanger their lives with no reason except for their selfish satisfaction. However, the professor explains that there are physical and chemical rewards involved in the risk-taking actions that trigger adrenaline through the body generating more self confidence.
Finally, the passage states that this type of personality tries to cover up the need for attention. Nonetheless, the lecture clarifies this argument saying that according to new research risk-taking personalities have shown high levels of social and financial success.
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
- ecotourism 52
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture, being sure to explain howthey challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Vacations 3
- language 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e considered positive skills attitudes. Second of all, the paper states that ris...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...levels of social and financial success.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17616580311 4.92477711251 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29442422272 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59585492228 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1996173451 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461237048241 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214381803273 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16022819817 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282791694132 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797261932688 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 11.4140731707 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.