The table shows oil production in Africa countries from 2000 to 2004 ( unit: barrels)
The table reveals statistics about the amount of oil generated in Nigeria, Chad, Congo, and Somalia between 2000 and 2004.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that with the exception of Congo, which saw a downward trend, the oil production of all mentioned countries witnessed a generally upward trajectory. Moreover, Nigeria is the nation that produced the highest quantities during the period.
Nigeria and Chad accounted for the maximum and minimum oil generation, respectively. The former started at 200000 barrels, then increased sharply to 278000 barrels in 2004. The latter produced no oil in the first three years but reporting approximately a fourfold rise from 50000 to 220000 barrels in two years later, making it become the second biggest manufacturer in the end.
Congo and Somalia ranked second and third at the beginning, at 2000 and 9000 barrels, correspondingly. Subsequently, after hitting its lowest point of 8000 barrels in 2001, the figure for Somalia climbed steadily by 7000 barrels in the final year. Congo, in contrast, underwent a gradual drop from 2000 to 1500 barrels over the entire period surveyed.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions 84
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...overall perspective, it is evident that with the exception of Congo, which saw a downward trend, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, moreover, second, so, then, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31868131868 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79350083275 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4983007027 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274903705759 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095578974466 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572400880391 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152859620088 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253475773563 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.