There are more workers who work from home and more students who study from home. This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, thanks to the reasonable cost and availability of digital technology, our society has witnessed an ever-increasing number of individuals who work or study online rather than going to their workplaces or educational institutions. This essay will analyze and then explain why I think this trend should be considered as a welcome development.
In terms of the laborers, the main supporting point is that working from home is much more conducive to their quality of life. First and foremost, this new method helps people save both time and money. To illustrate, they would pay less for facilities fees such as office expenditure or traveling fees. Workers now did not need to fritter away so much time on several time-consuming activities like transporting to their companies, doing makeup, or getting dressed too formally. As a result, people would have more financial budget and time to enjoy their life. Furthermore, internet-based working appears to be very helpful regarding tackling urgent problems because people can hold meetings at any time of day or night, no matter where they are. It is exemplified by many multinational enterprises, which organize discussions including employees and business partners all over the world regardless of time or their locations.
Turning to students, studying online make them learn more effectively owing to the comfortable environment and various sources of information being related to their curriculums at schools. If students learn from home, they may not be put under control or pressure from their teachers, which paves the way for their creativity. Moreover, just by searching on the internet, they can approach enormous available materials to use online or download them to serve their own purposes. For instance, many learners nowadays choose to study English online through websites like BBC Learning English or BBC News, which provide them with a variety of helpful lessons about all four different skills.
In conclusion, I restate that taking advantage of technological devices for distant working or studying should be seen as progress. I highly recommend people to develop and make it more popular in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | tiffanyfighting | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-14 | nam.phanthanh97 | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 84 | view |
- Topic Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries 80
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in a particular country who participated in sports compared with the percentage of people who watched them in 2000 69
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 73
- The charts show the spending of a school in 1981 1991 and 2001 5 lines 3 n m 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36734693878 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94527602582 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65889212828 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9318800874 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.733333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203015180273 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066086518075 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636161829011 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117721291099 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250533559223 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.