The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart illustrates how much money was spent on five various types of products in two different countries in the year 2010 and measured in the unit of pounds sterling. Overall, it can be seen that people in British spent more money on consumer goods than those in France except the categories of perfume and computers. In addition, the most money was spent on cars while the least money was spent on perfume in both countries.
In terms of the UK, the amount of money spent on cars was highest among all categories, approximately 450.000 pounds, which was over 3 times as much as that of perfume, 150.000 pounds. Meanwhile, the figure for cameras and computers was nearly equal, about 350,000 pounds. This was just 50.000 pounds lower than the figure for books, more than 400.000 pounds in the year shown.
With regard to the France, people in this country spent the lowest amount of money on the figure for cameras and perfume, 150.000 compared with 200.000. Conversely, the figure for cars took the first position, at 400.000 pounds, which was just 20.000 pounds over than that of computers, about 380.000 pounds. The corresponding figure for books also saw a considerable contribution, at 300.000 pounds in the year surveyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant 84
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 84
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 89
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he year 2010 and measured in the unit of pounds sterling. Overall, it can be seen...
^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s sterling. Overall, it can be seen that people in British spent more money on co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, so, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92822966507 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47862592102 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8739802548 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0629101980715 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336083725018 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587080579658 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051354324207 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061171489043 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.