The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
The line graph provides information about the proportion of private use of CD player, mobile phone, home computer and Internet access between 1996 and 2003 in the UK.
Overall, both four kinds of domestic access experienced a significant rise in comparison with the beginning. At the end of the period, CD player and mobile phone were the most common.
In 1996/1997, CD player dominated with 60% of using, followed by home computer (nearly 30%) and mobile phone (under 20%). Meanwhile, the Internet only starting in 1998/1999 showed the lowest figure with the percentage of about 10%.
At the end of the period, CD player stayed most popular, going from 60% to over 80%. Unsurprisingly, mobile phone had the most noticeable upward, from under 20% to around 70% although it had levelled off during the last year of 20th century. The percentage of the UK people using home computer also increased by almost 30%. Despite the late start, Internet access grew by more than 30%, from about 10% to over 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | mary.ssherr | view | |
| 2023-06-11 | Phan Quang Tuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | mary.ssherr | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | Vinty | 79 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | nguyendynamo | 67 | view |
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel to work every day The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long dist 41
- Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum How far do you agree or disagree 73
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professsions because of their gender 78
- The graph below shows how elderly people in Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88235294118 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51117915754 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7611266631 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135912310913 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603851613996 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567012562355 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903140022015 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313917569858 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.