Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is said by many that the authorities should allocate more funds for the railway system than for roads. Though I understand developing rail transport is important, I think that it is unreasonable to disregard the importance of roads.
On the one hand, It is true that the development of rail lines brings many advantages. For example, if high-speed rails are more commonly installed and used for public transportation, it is likely that the number of private cars will considerably decrease, hence improving the traffic situation. Plus, with impressive speed and high-quality facilities, the express train system provides faster and better travelling experiences to customers. Though the railway system has expensive initial installation cost, its benefits are long-term.
On the other hand, I believe that the significance of roads should not be disregarded for several reasons. It is reported that there have been more accidents occurring on roads than in railway transport. Therefore, ignoring to improve road safety would definitely lead to a significant rise in the number of deaths related to traffic. Plus, as roads are more frequently used, not making an effort to improve road facilities would cause a lot of inconvenience to citizens. From a larger perspective, this would also be partially responsible for the imbalance in the development of traffic infrastructure as rail lines are considerably more developed.
In conclusion, though I do not deny the fact that the investment in rail lines has great benefits, I disagree that railway transport is prioritized over roads. In my opinion, the government should fund the railway and road systems equally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Countries are becoming more similar because people are able to buy the same products IS IT A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...essive speed and high-quality facilities , the express train system provides not o...
^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...long-term benefits. On the other hand, i believe that the significance of roads ...
^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... more developed. In conclusion, though i do not deny the fact that the investmen...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9975421933 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7899833321 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.076923077 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149072887705 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574621743601 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475208038649 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824248544514 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533308044334 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.