The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of 3 different age groups of American elders who were above 65 years old in a century
Overall, the population in the US was getting older throughout the period, when there were increases in the population of elderly people until the final year. While people from 65 to 74 dominated the population age 65 and over as the crowdest, the percentage of people who were over 85 was much lower.
In 1990, elders aged 65 to 74 accounted for only 2.9% of the elderly population, which was roughly 3 times higher than 2 other figures with merely 1% and 0.2% for those from 75 to 84 and elders over 85. Subsequently, all age groups’ proportions grew steadily until 1940, when the figures for population aged 65-74 and 75-84 increased significantly to 4.8% and 1.7% respectively.
From 1940 upwards, the portion of elders began to rise considerably and reached its peak at 12.6% in 1990, including 7.3%, 4.0% and 1.2% of people between 65-74, 75-84 and over 85 years old respectively, then was witnessed with a 0.2% decrease in the following year. Nonetheless, although all age groups were reported with remarkable declines of 4% to 8%, the figure for those who were above 85 marginally climbed from 1.2% to 1.5%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | khuekhue | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | asmita acharya | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views a 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 85 marginally climbed from 1.2% to 1.5%
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8511627907 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73247798002 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2908685111 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.833333333 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8333333333 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151279726355 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899076218949 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435789904487 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103777762249 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359943126319 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.