It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development?
Thanks to the science progress, humans now are able to travel to remote natural areas for a variety of purposes . Although there are still some risks during the expeditions, after the trips scientists and tourists can gain enormous benefits.
The trip can bring about a myriad of knowledge and scientists can find more effective ways to protect the nature . Firstly, real data and factual knowledge is necessary for researchers to understand the Earth and that’s why travelling to the sites is imperative. This not only gets more information about nature but also helps other scientific investigations. In addition, scientists will have chance to find the way to protect nature against to the harms from humans. In fact, on-site data can provide solutions to the extinction of a large amount of animals living in remote areas such as South Pole.
Besides that, another advantage of travelling to further area may give tourists the extraordinary experiences that they haven’t had before. That is one of the ways for amusing and relaxing which interests adventurous and inquisitive people . Humans always want to explore and challenge themself to take risks, unlike ordinary trip, going to isolated natural places such as Amazon rainforest or Sahara desert instead of common scenic spots gives travelers valuable memories and unforgettable feelings. Furthermore, journey’s experiences will be an alarm bell to awaken the awareness of protecting nature. When people have chance to feel the pleasure and beauty of nature, they will appreciate what nature gave to humans and raise the perception of the importance of protecting environment.
In conclusion, travelling to remote natural locations benefits every entity depending on their targets. The unusual journeys will be the great choice as long as there is no disruption to the original state of the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | ThanhTam21 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | Duyenle2606 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | AnhanhThu | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | lap1604 | 56 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 89
- The bar chart shows the number of people who visited different Museums in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... natural areas for a variety of purposes . Although there are still some risks dur...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ore effective ways to protect the nature . Firstly, real data and factual knowledg...
^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in remote areas such as South Pole. Besides that, another advantage of trave...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rests adventurous and inquisitive people . Humans always want to explore and chall...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'isolate'
Suggestion: isolate
...e risks, unlike ordinary trip, going to isolated natural places such as Amazon rainfores...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, as for, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36054421769 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84621937913 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62925170068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7260868826 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219662244001 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692416619242 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490657040685 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12954643881 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478478707687 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.