The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
The given bar chart illustrates how many girls per 100 boys went to three types of school education, namely primary, secondary and tertiary education in two years: 1990 and 1998.
Overall, it is clear that there was a gradual increase in the number of female students in all three mentioned level of eduacation during the period. Moreover, it can be seen that there was more female students enrolled school in developed countries than in developing ones.
In developing, it was witnessed a slight growth in the number of girls per 100 boys entered school. From 1990 to 1998, this number went up from 83 to 87 in primary school, from 72 to 82 in secondary school and for tertiary school, this figure rose by 9 students.
In term of developed country, the data was much bigger than the other countries. The number of female students per 100 male ones climbed slightly from 95 to 96, from 98 to 99 and from 205 to 112 in primary, secondary and teriary education perspectively. In addtion, the figure in teriary education in developed countries was the only one achieved the target of 100 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | bapcai | 67 | view |
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 70
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78010471204 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58948031364 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1813200461 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295096003287 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12828123865 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979283091433 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177234012685 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674927397975 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.