In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this jostling and hustle full of world, everyone's opinion does not matter, the highest prioriety is given to the sage or the connocour in that field and not to the charlateran, who pretends to be an expert in that field. The issue suggests that, the modt of the arts to be awarded with merit, it must be understood to most of the people. In my opinion, this might not hold true. Because, the quality of the success of art cannot be based on the overall opinion of the world, it depends upon the indept evaluation and its deep meaning it beholds the impact it makes in the society.
Credibility and merit of an art depends upon its understanding and the value it holds, not the materialistic, the emotions with which the art has to depect and convey to the world. These emotions can be variable, one person might interprit the art as helcyon and emotional but the other might see as full of anger and hatered. Thus, there can be a variety of comments on art work, critics might defame it, whiled the lovers will praise it. So, we cannot depend on the understanding of most of the peoples concern to decide wheather it has some merits or not. It depends upon the comments of those who have clear and accurate understanding of the art work and has an assidous working abilities in the field. The opinion of the people who does not have any experience or the right eye to look at the art to get the accurate and overall understanding of the art. Because, such person can demote and weaken the value of art and degrade it by its false comments.
The person who pretends to be an expert in that field will provide and false claim on the work of art and will surely degrade its value of importance and will provide an bad impression in the society. For example, a piece of art which has intecrete, recondite meaning hidden in it, and can be understand only by the experts will be able to express and feel the accurate emotions the artist want to express and make stand in the society. The one who do not have knowledge to understand the art will defame the work and will spread negative word about it. Thus, to define merits of artwork, understanding of most of the people is not important.
Of course, one might say, if some people would not be able to grasp the real meaning behind it. Then, what is the point in building such work of art, as it cannot convey the emotions it beholds. But, this might not be the case, the one who has the potential to convey the right meaning of the art can help to spread the accurate emotions and help in bolstering the art.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | seoul_milk | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Saugat Basnet | 50 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 60
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 30
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ts value of importance and will provide an bad impression in the society. For exam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41983122363 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39232041315 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402953586498 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0745340135 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.388888889 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197701423862 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766864814194 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498288431448 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127094481666 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425570485825 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ts value of importance and will provide an bad impression in the society. For exam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41983122363 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39232041315 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402953586498 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0745340135 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.388888889 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197701423862 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766864814194 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498288431448 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127094481666 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425570485825 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.