In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

In order for any work of art-for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song-to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

In the human history, some artists are respected for their masterpieces by the public, while the majority is merely neglected by the people. One might say that the works should be understood by the contemporaries in order to have some kind of merit, but I disagree with the given claim, regarding the significant examples of chef d’oeuvres esteemed posthumously.
Granted, if an artist is praised to demonstrate fathomable works by most people, he or she would garner such advantages. Take Leonardo da Vinci as a compelling example. While he is appraised as an ingenious architect, painter, sculptor, and inventor, he was already assessed in the same way at his times. He was definitely patronized by the House of Medici as his talent was admitted by the public. Not only his pieces of works but himself as an artist, were very highly appraised. Such an epitome of a successful artist demonstrates that whether being understood by the people is a very critical factor to have merit.
Nevertheless, there are some artists who were venerated after their deaths. Vincent van Gogh is a very prominent example. It is very well-known that he was not so respected during his life, while suffering from poverty. He had not even had enough money to buy materials for painting, which is clearly demonstrated in the series of his letters with his brother, Theo van Gogh. Later after his death, the consensus of panegyrize about van Gogh appeared in the art history, which never demolishes so far. In South Korea, van Gogh is ranked as the most preferred artists in the national scale. Van Gogh, as a conspicuous example, proves that it does not have to be necessarily admitted by the contemporaries to have such merits.
Furthermore, posthumously esteemed artists are salient in the field of literature as well. Franz Kafka, who is recognized as one of the greatest writers ever, was actually trifled until his death. It is another well-known story that Kafka left a will to a friend of his, to incinerate all his manuscripts, before his death from tuberculosis. If his friend was loyal to the will, we would not be able to relish his masterpieces such as “Metamorphosis”. Kafka is another preeminent prodigy, who was unfortunately overlooked in his times.
To summarize, despite the importance to be understood by the contemporaries, I disagree with the claim that this is the prerequisite to show such merits from an artist’s oeuvres. Further, I would like to note that we must try our best not to miss another ingenious artist.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-10-26	Jbrachael	66	view
2023-09-30	seoul_milk	75	view
2023-09-29	seoul_milk	58	view
2022-09-19	Kalyani_tekade_24	50	view
2022-04-06	Saugat Basnet	50	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Essays by user seoul_milk :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, kind of, such as, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9929245283 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02858107218 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.613680877 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2272727273 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112807987578 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331545640972 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409156637797 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738902219157 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456873062545 0.0667264976115 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, kind of, such as, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments