The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The bar graph elucidates how many dollars were generated from video games for four different features. namely, mobile phone, online games console, handheld games in years between 2000 to 2006.
Overall, it can be manifested that the highest amount of dollars generated in handheld video games in the given period. However, console games decrease over the period also some other games fluctuated in the year between 2000 to 2006.
Firstly, the highest amount of dollar generated on handheld games in the over period approximately 11.5 dollars in the year 2008 it increased significantly and reached in the year 2006 it was 70.9 dollars. whereas console video games it was a $6 in the first year and it decreased dramatically in the given period it was half 3 dollar in the year.
Secondary, online and mobile phone games almost decline in the first two years and it was1 dollar increased in the year 2002. Moreover in the year 2003, 4.5 and 4 dollars respectively also its similar dollars ratios were observed in the year 2004 which was $5 and it increased moderately in the year 2006 which was 6.5 dollars for the mobile phone and $8 for the online games global sale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research 73
- The diagrams give information about the manufacturer of frozen fish pies 84
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The bar chart shows the divorce rate in two European countries from 2011to 2015
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Namely
...ideo games for four different features. namely, mobile phone, online games console, ha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...d in the year 2006 it was 70.9 dollars. whereas console video games it was a in the fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ars. whereas console video games it was a in the first year and it decreased dra...
^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. whereas console video games it was a in the first year and it decreased drama...
^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...was1 dollar increased in the year 2002. Moreover in the year 2003, 4.5 and 4 dollars res...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were observed in the year 2004 which was and it increased moderately in the year ...
^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was 6.5 dollars for the mobile phone and for the online games global sale.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86868686869 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44208501208 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1027667962 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261861082984 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141266629044 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614502589634 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192711670811 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779940294096 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.