The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about lit it burn policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the let it burn Howev

Essay topics:

The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about ( lit it burn)policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest. The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the ( let it burn). However, the lecture refutes this notion. She state burning of forest is a natural part of ecosystem.
First, the author states, yellowstone fires cause huge damage to trees and other vegetation. after fire died out, trees were blacked from flames and smoke. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She illustrates, fires remove some type of trees, But, in the other word enable other types to grow up and spreads. In addition, yellow stone become more spread.
Second, the author asserts, park wild was effected by fires. Animals like deer fleeing from fire. Moreover, small animals can not escape. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this argument. She mentions, animals like plants. Some of them dead, But many types of animals like rabbits increase in its population. Fires give opportunity to a lot of animal to spread ang increase their population.
Finally, the reading passage contends, fires had negative effect on value of the park. Its reduce number of tourists who might visit the park, therefore it will effect local economy. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, these fire end in short time. She mentions fire that occur in 1900, this fire suppress and tourists visit this park after one year.

The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about ( lit it burn)policy like yellow stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fires of forest. The writer claims three kinds of damaged caused by the ( let it burn). However, the lecture refutes this notion. She state burning of forest is a natural part of ecosystem.
First, the author states, yellowstone fires cause huge damage to trees and other vegetation. after fire died out, trees were blacked from flames and smoke. This statement is challenged by lecturer. She illustrates, fires remove some type of trees, But, in the other word enable other types to grow up and spreads. In addition, yellow stone become more spread.
Second, the author asserts, park wild was effected by fires. Animals like deer fleeing from fire. Moreover, small animals can not escape. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this argument. She mentions, animals like plants. Some of them dead, But many types of animals like rabbits increase in its population. Fires give opportunity to a lot of animal to spread ang increase their population.
Finally, the reading passage contends, fires had negative effect on value of the park. Its reduce number of tourists who might visit the park, therefore it will effect local economy. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, these fire end in short time. She mentions fire that occur in 1900, this fire suppress quicly and tourists visit this park after one year.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-08 talelaldabous 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and the lecture are both talking about lit it burnpolicy like yellow stone fire...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w stone fire which occur in United State which is mean not to suppress natural fi...
^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ims three kinds of damaged caused by the let it burn. However, the lecture refute...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forest is a natural part of ecosystem. First, the author states, yellowstone fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...e damage to trees and other vegetation. after fire died out, trees were blacked from ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, yellow stone become more spread. Second, the author asserts, park wild wa...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spread ang increase their population. Finally, the reading passage contends, f...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...might visit the park, therefore it will effect local economy. The professor rebuts th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visit the park, therefore it will effect local economy. The professor rebuts this...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition, in short, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03629032258 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29916158428 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4439930593 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.4761904762 110.228320801 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8095238095 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409207122317 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102756975885 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155293524429 0.0662205650399 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277159997063 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.297875373389 0.0443174109184 672% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.06 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.