The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map illustrates the differences in Grange park between 1920 and nowadays.
Overall, comparing the past and reality, except for the main entrances and the rose garden on the left side upward, predominantly features have been changing during the time.
Firstly, it can be easily seen, such as the most clearly indicated spots, the old performing place refurbished into a bigger amphitheater which based on the left marginal area. Additionally, that is the appearance of the rose garden in the center had substituted for the fountain after many years constructed going along with the disappearance of the rose garden below the theater. A water container is also added below on the right side place which was the glasshouse before.
Observing other details, in the beginning, although the seats were around the park margins in the past, nowadays they are based near the rose garden in the middle. On the other hand, having a new addition underground parking lot under the water feature. Finally, the ecological pond and the flower garden next to that now are turning into a coffee shop and an amusement area for kids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-13 | Haley Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | Haley Nguyen | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- ki 11
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information and by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Give your opinion and discuss this issue 84
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee shop and an amusement area for kids.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, so, except for, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03743315508 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64978523235 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652406417112 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4983835907 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899633561097 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417537131231 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357896289435 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629906412083 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329056491955 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.