Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, the trend has been increased towards tourism to other countries. A section of society thought that people visit other countries need to follow their trend ritual and cultural habits. Others contradict this statement and argue that people visit that country, not adapt to that culture, and locals need to adapt positive points. According to my perspective, tourists need to recognise their local rituals and show their own culture. In the course of the essay, I will discuss both viewpoints.
Firstly, those people visit other countries to explore it. They need to follow local customs and respect them because if they follow that tradition then show exhibit their culture if people start to wear that culture, then their own culture will diminish then might be after some time that local tradition disappear. Visitors need to show equality with those locals, and the best way to show this equality is to apply the local rules themselves. For example, visitors come to a city and they do not local food, to fulfil this demand there will open a foreign food restaurant they will decrease the demand local foods.
The opponent of this debate argue that tourists go there in small groups in that highly populated areas if these people follow own traditions then it does not destroy that local culture which is followed by the majority of the public. Instead of this, they destroy their rituals however they will teach positives of their own rituals. For instance, if visitors do yoga in the morning time and the teach their locals which will good for their healths.
In conclusion, tourists visit other countries instead show off their culture they respect that local rituals tradition, although they teach positive things to locals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | niloya | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004 67
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...isitors do yoga in the morning time and the teach their locals which will good for their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cals which will good for their healths. In conclusion, tourists visit other coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rituals'' or 'ritual's'?
Suggestion: rituals'; ritual's
...f their culture they respect that local rituals tradition, although they teach positive...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26513669191 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486206896552 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6224506139 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215959661286 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922903204599 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547495029657 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146732438284 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350842427431 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.