The chart below shows the expenditure of 2 countries on consumer goods in 2010
The bar chart illustrates the payment on consumer goods of two different countries, namely France and the UK in 2010
Overall, it can be seen from the chart, the French has lower spending than the British. Additionally, while the British spent money on cars, books and cameras, the French seemed to spend more on computers and perfume.
In terms of cars, there were 450000 pounds spent in England the number was 400000 pounds for the French. When it comes to books, amount of money spent by the French was around 300000, although people in England spent 400000 pounds. Moreover, the spending figures for cameras in France were only 150000, while the British spenders used over 350000 pounds.
Regarding computers , people in France used around 380000 pounds, about 80000 more than the average spending of people in Great Britain which was approximately 300000 pounds. With reference to perfume, the French spent 200000 pounds, compared to under 150000 pounds of the British spenders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of 2 countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The chart below shows information about students in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 92
- The bar charts below show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 60
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries, namely France and the UK in 2010 Overall, it can be seen from the chart, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...over 350000 pounds. Regarding computers , people in France used around 380000 pou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13664596273 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31540733157 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9573562106 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065675781572 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310271223362 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760006179105 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704781732193 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103660501659 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.