Some people think that Technology has made man more social while others think people have become less social discuss both views and give your opinion
Some people argue that people around the world are being connected with others socially by technology. Personally, I consider both these aspects before concluding my final decision.
First of all, let research the positive effects that technology helps social closely. The most important reason is technology has changed the way people conservation with each other. It makes us keep friends or family tightly despite the distance. At present, many people who have to work far from home and relatives can use many useful apps to see each other faces. This helps them do not feel homesick and brings high morale to concentrate at work. For example, a Vietnamese person who works in France still can see their family and friends through Facebook, and thus it is a far more convenient approach to socializing.
On the other hand, technology has few bad consequences in human life. Nowadays, in a modern city, many young people have been addicted to technology which brings several negative impacts both physically and mentally. For instance, if children use phones too much, they will be at a high risk of getting some diseases like short-sightedness, heart attack, or even worst is autism. Furthermore, there is a gap between old generations and young generations because of the lack of technological knowledge, which leads to weakness among other relationships. For instance, young kids nowadays usually play with phones or laptops and do not take time to talk or play with their seniors. As a result, face-to-face conservation become rarely which brings loneliness to the elderly.
In conclusion, technology has changed the method of interaction with one another to more convenient and useful. However, people still need time to take care of their families and do not use technology blindly. This helps our community become a better place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | buiminhduc | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 84
- some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 61
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measures could governments and individuals take to respond 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'become'.
Suggestion: rarely become
... As a result, face-to-face conservation become rarely which brings loneliness to the elderly....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18791946309 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84160629991 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627516778523 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4852911539 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9411764706 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210426795161 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653238214698 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635265272534 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138999483835 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439392684958 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.