The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006.
The column chart illustrates the differences and changes in the proportions of both genders who ate five different kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that percentages of females outnumbered that of males, except for over 75 year-old group with equal numbers. Noticeably, 56-65 year-old group dominated the market with the highest percentages,
In particular, in terms of women, the percentage of 56-65 year-old group was at 27%, which was the highest score, followed by 22% in 66-74 year-old group. The third largest proportion was 20%, which was represented by 26-55 years old. It was accompanied by over 75 years old at 19%, which was the fourth largest. Besides, 15-25 year-old group constituted the smallest percentage.
Meanwhile, when it comes to males, the top three positions were 56-65, 66-74, over 75 years old with 24%, 21%, 19% respectively, followed by 18% in 26-55 year-old group. The lowest proportion was 15%, which was represented by 15-25 years old. Noticeably, the gap was relatively closed over the research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | maiphuong0610 | 73 | view |
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 87
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, third, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13966480447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78160682656 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1611005941 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100788666806 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567468988008 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134723233157 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100422773947 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134449718998 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.