The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.

Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown.

The chart express, the number of man and women do labor in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.
Overall, The highest performance of both males and females is in the public sector. However, they show the lowest performance in the public sector. Moreover, In all the sectors male performance is higher than female.
In the manufacturing sector, women cross 200 in employment. Moreover, the man crosses 600 in this sector which is double of women performance. In the same way, In the communication sector, the employment of both men and women is much less which is 250.Approximately half of the manufacturing.
In the finance and banking sector, the employment of men and women is about 400.
Moreover, their participation in wholesale and retail trade, and the public sector is too high which is about 650 and 850 approximately. However, their employment in the public sector is so poor. which is 200. And the women performance in this sector is approximately 10 which is so poor contribution.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-09 cupinsiuway 73 view
2021-10-20 Kubraguran 56 view
2021-10-20 Kubraguran 56 view
2021-08-25 rafsanfardin 67 view
2021-08-25 rafsanfardin 67 view
Essays by user rafsanfardin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Approximately
...men and women is much less which is 250.Approximately half of the manufacturing. In the fina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...oyment in the public sector is so poor. which is 200. And the women performance in th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oyment in the public sector is so poor. which is 200. And the women performance in th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01162790698 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12137296274 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459302325581 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8996386613 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8333333333 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191205428251 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819993520998 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742147368347 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131235099705 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891393270034 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.