As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling, there is an growing demand for more flights.
What problems does this have on the environment?
What measures could be taken to solve the problems?
These days more people make use of airplanes to travel the world. This intense usage leads to several problems to the environment. Some ecologists think that it can destroy the world. In this essay, I will outline these problems and possible ways to deal with it.
Let us start with problems an increase in flights can cause. First of all, it may result in air pollution. Large jets usually emit a vast amount of exhaust gases into the atmosphere, which living creatures, including humans, breathe. These gases tend to accumulate in lungs and over time it turns into serious diseases such as asthma and cancer. Another repercussion is that it requires more airports. Airlines will build more airports to accommodate new tourist destinations so they will do it at the expense of pristine areas of land for construction sites. As a result, local animals will be forced to flee their natural habitats. Thereby, after analyzing these problems, it is clear that the growing demand for flights can pose serious threat to both humans and wildlife.
Nevertheless, some politicians claim that these problems are possible to solve. They suggest the following measures to take. They recommend to develop environmentally friendly airplanes. It will reduce the level of air pollution by half and make room for an increase in the number of flights. They also advise to use existing roads. This approach will remove the need for new airports and save the local animals from eviction. For example, in Kazakhstan the government frequently reserves highways for airplanes to land when the airports cannot accommodate them during the tourist season. Hence, after considering these solutions, it is evident that it is probable to solve the problems with this flight growth.
In conclusion, even thought the demand for more flights can lead to the above-mentioned problems, I think that it is possible to deal with them successfully by taking the suggested solutions.
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 78
- The Internet is replacing books. What extent do you agree? 61
- Some employers() want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 73
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.To what extent do you agree? 78
- You have recently moved into a new house You want to tell your friend about your good news Write to your friend In the letter Describe the house Describe the neighbourhood Invite your friend to come and see the house 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend developing'.
Suggestion: recommend developing
...st the following measures to take. They recommend to develop environmentally friendly airplanes. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...the number of flights. They also advise to use existing roads. This approach will remo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15094339623 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74487775003 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6832982041 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243252969885 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647112239441 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505380328774 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141419693866 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312986465599 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.