Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up-to-date access to the news on the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, the Internet is generally considered as the fastest information- providing media and has always occupied the favorable lists. Despite its convenience, I don’t think the Internet can completely replace newspapers in our daily life. In the following essay, I will explain both sides of this trend and give my own opinion.
It is undeniable that the Internet brings people various advantages in getting information. Firstly, there is an enormous amount of international websites on the Internet that users can easily access. Whilst traditional information media like radio or newspaper only includes national news and stories, this new method allows readers to approach worldwide articles. Moreover, the Internet also helps utilize the charge which users usually have to pay. For instance, people are required to make a payment on the daily newspaper; however, accessing these websites is nearly free. Additionally, this new type of media also makes users access the information in the fastest way. In particular, with a gentle click or tap on their devices, people can easily read an
international article immediately.
Nevertheless, Internet still remains some drawbacks that make newspapers and other old media not able to be removed. Wi-Fi connection and Internet are not available for all areas and people. In other words, some disadvantaged villages or elderly are impossible to find Internet available and convenient. When using the Internet, users may still have to pay for not only Wi-Fi connection but also their monthly electric bills.
In conclusion, the Internet plays an important role in our life; however, newspapers still don’t lose their popularity, especially for senior and inaccessible people. Regardless of these factors, I believe that the Internet is possible to outweigh other traditional media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | Lotuslotus | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Lotuslotus | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Lotuslotus | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Lotuslotus | 84 | view |
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52464788732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89659067734 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0240273593 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1406545335 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475255351685 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248003530628 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687495825631 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376945602591 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.