The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different
countries in 2002.
The given table compares the budget people in five nations spending on three categories of products and services in 2002
Overall, it is apparent that the most significant incomes of all countries were used for food, drink, and tobacco and the least for pastime and education.
In terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, the percentage of consumer expenditure in Turkey was the highest, at 32,14%. The figures for Ireland, Spain, and Italy were lower, at 28,91%, 18,80%, and 16,36%, respectively. However, the amount of money spent by the Swedish accounted for the lowest proportion, at only nearly 16%.
Regarding clothing and footwear, the Italians spent 9% of their incomes compared to only 5,40% used by the Swedish. The figures of the remaining nations were around 6%. In addition, the proportion of spending on leisure and education of Turkey citizens was 4,35%. At the same time, around 3% of Italian and Swedish incomes was paid on recreation and teaching services, and only approximately 2% of the budget of people in Ireland and Spain fell into this category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 67
- the diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 73
- online classes make controversial classrooms unnecessary To what extent you agree or disagree 11
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07386363636 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64222873265 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7214358359 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753191161928 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279187706854 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451764242638 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612824535362 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663845031848 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.