Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree ?
In modern era, scientists play a paramount role in individuals role. Handful of people seem that the entertainers are more important in comparison to scientists. Therefore, I completely disagree with this notion because, scientists do lot of innovations which become aids in the everyone life.
To embrace with, the scientist innovate numerous gadgets which individuals use in their daily basis such as mobile phones, televisions and many other items. It promotes to make life easy. For instance, in last decade, the whole world was suffered from pandemic situations in which government enforced the lockdown due to which, individuals became fed up in their homes.
In this criteria, individuals utilise their mobile phones for their all tasks which become helpful to them in COVID-19 situation. Therefore, scientific innovation become prominent to homo sapiens.
Furthermore, scientists also prepare medicines which helpful to masses to those who are suffered from diseases. Whereas, it is crucial point because entertainers are good for nothing in comparison to scientists. For instance, in 2020, the world stucked in pandemic situation and the cases of this issue was on alarmed rate. Therefore, scientists prepare covid shield vaccine which aids the individuals who faced such problems. Moreover, scientists also forcast about regular weather which becomes too helpful to individuals.
To conclude, scientists are paramount instead of entertainers because this aids more in the daily basis of individuals and make their lifestyle much comfortable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-21 | Dangdang | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 67
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000
- The chart and graph below gives information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our life and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Today Tv channels broadcast men s sports shows more than women s sport shows Why is this case Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
...lot of innovations which become aids in the everyone life. To embrace with, the scientist ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uals became fed up in their homes. In this criteria, individuals utilise their mob...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64957264957 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91429179166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0397494974 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136787550808 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544445231373 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691845194632 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913141534868 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887851523885 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
...lot of innovations which become aids in the everyone life. To embrace with, the scientist ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uals became fed up in their homes. In this criteria, individuals utilise their mob...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64957264957 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91429179166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0397494974 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136787550808 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544445231373 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691845194632 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913141534868 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887851523885 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.