the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater-goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre.
The chart gives information about the irritant based on theater-goers during their watching experience.
Looking from an overall perspective, most of those people were disturbed by the rustling sweet papers, those remaining factors accounted for more than 25% of each one.
As the chart portrays, rustling sweet paper was the primary reason that bothered a hefty 92% of cinema-goes, followed by approximately 78% of coughing, which was 2-3% higher than arriving late. On the other hand, 65% of theater-goes cited that they were irritated by the whisper, while more than 50% were from mobile phones. It is also shown that half of surveyed complain about sneezing.
As for disturbances related to bleeps and armrest hogging contributed to 42% and 25%, respectively. There was a similarity in the statistics of flash photography and big hairdos when they both concluded 30% of the sampled. In addition, the proportion of tall people was witnessed to be equal to that of snoring at 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | beauty flowers | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-20 | mahsa1989 | 67 | view |
- The charts below show population statistics in two countries of the UK from 1700 to 2000 78
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693176227 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69375 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0960356046 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103305327099 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043140338188 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529179759773 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717300635703 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061264248672 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693176227 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69375 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0960356046 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103305327099 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043140338188 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529179759773 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717300635703 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061264248672 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.