Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is contended that only the most affluent individuals across the globe can reap the benefit from air flight whereas the growth of air travel provides no positive impacts on ordinary people. While this idea is valid to a certain extent, I do believe that it also brings about apparent advantages to long-distance transportation and the privilege.
On the one hand, it is argued that traveling via aircraft is only beneficial to wealthy people. It is true that air tickets are more affordable to people who are from high-income backgrounds owing to the exceedingly exorbitant services. Therefore, they can do business abroad or travel for holidays by airplanes on a frequent basis instead of seriously taking them into account to allocate money for other significant needs.
However, this is a flawed idea due to the fact that air-related services could benefit various citizens adequately. First and foremost, it is undeniable that space flight helps to transport various kinds of products for long distances to remote areas without the complexity emerging. To be more specific, along with the increasing demand for consumption, air travel presents a possibility for every person throughout the world to obtain substantive items according to personal needs in lieu of traveling to other developed places to purchase them. Secondly, traveling by airlines also enables the poor to go on overseas' trips at reasonable prices due to the recent reduction in the cost of tickets and other relevant benefits. In other words, even people from third-world nations can give them a try to enjoy the swiftness and comfort without getting fatigued when moving by alternative modes of transport. Furthermore, air travel also creates job opportunities for employees in distant regions. In comparison with the past, when it was nearly impossible to migrate to other nations, thanks to the upgrading and expansion of the airline system, people who are from low-income backgrounds stand a better chance of earning a lucrative job by moving to developed nations.
In conclusion, why some individuals believe that only the nobility can benefit enormously from aviation, I would like to reiterate that citizens can also make the most of long-distance freight transportation and the stretching of an abroad business domain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | fengling110119 | 52 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 84 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Today TV channels provide more men s sports than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omplexity emerging. To be more specific, along with the increasing demand for con...
^^
Line 5, column 1003, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...es for employees in distant regions. In comparison with the past, when it was nearly impos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, in conclusion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31420765027 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94670959461 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579234972678 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8877714448 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.615384615 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1538461538 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331446759943 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102645446304 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626218634508 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192573673819 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584766099753 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.