Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Few individuals contend that there is a lack of recycled products from home, thus imposing an official rule to force citizens to increase their amount of recycling is the only method believed to be effective. While this view is valid to a certain extent, I somewhat agree with it because there are other more pragmatic methods to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, if a recycling-related rule is strictly set, various people will perceive the significance of the matter and obey the rules owing to the possibility of being sentenced or seriously punished for their offense. However, this is actually a flawed solution. As an increasing quantity of disposable items is generated, governments would not be able to require individuals to reuse their past products, leading to an alarming rate of waste released to the environment.
On the other hand, I believe that the increase in the cost of daily commodities and the rise of collections for recycled products are more effective means to address the root of the problem. First and foremost, raising the price of items will present an opportunity for people to reuse the products. A good illustration of this is if the price of a flower vase is 50 dollars, customers will take several used water bottles or glass into account and design them to arrange flowers for the ornamental purpose . Secondly, there is no doubt that considering recycling as a work of art may increase the number of reused products. A particular example of this is the more clubs and projects for decorating and designing old items have been opened, appealing to not only ordinary people, especially the youth but also the media, which then propagandize about the outstanding merits of these environmentally friendly activities.
In conclusion, I somewhat support the notion that a new law should be enacted to raise public awareness about recycling. However, I admit that there are different potential approaches that contribute to a higher rate of recycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...range flowers for the ornamental purpose . Secondly, there is no doubt that consid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93534886282 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588414634146 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3276274765 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218911344186 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068375311599 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057901262601 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118066831904 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607220129965 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.