Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that the more people use mobile phones and computers, the less they communicate directly with others. I completely agree with this statement, and in this essay I will show two reasons why.
First of all, people, especially the youngsters, now depend too much to their phones. They are addicted to social media like Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and open these apps whenever they can. This usually leads to lack of face to face conversations between people, since even when they are with each others but still keep their eye on the phones. A family meeting, for example, with all the family members participating in order to talk about their days, but then everyone just pulls out their smart phones and swipe it until the meeting is over.
Secondly, with mobile phones and computers, it is easy to find and contact friends or colleagues through online messages. Because of no eye-to-eye contact, people feel more confident and talk freely, and gradually lose the ability to communicate directly. For instance, a group of people with the same interest, they can chat with others endless on the internet, but then only feel awkward when they finally hang out, decide to avoid talking as much as possible, lead to lack of proper conversations.
In conclusion, people are likely to talk less to each other as long as they depend on their phones and computers, since they are addicted to social media and contact with others through the internet rather than have a real conversation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-10 | duyenle1001 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | LUCIALUSO | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | LUCIALUSO | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | nghiemngoc2912 | 73 | view |
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- some people say it is a waste of tiem to plan for the future and that it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more prisons are being built to house the world s criminals many people believe long term imprisonment is the answer to solving the crime problem However others feel that psychological assistance is what is required Discuss both views and give yo 82
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95256916996 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.511415298 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6887780437 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19844866653 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828844723462 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662190941995 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129918794996 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546452254353 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.