Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It true that mobile phones and computers play an intergral part in our lives. While I accept that the development of technology may helps us feel comfortable in living, I believe that it does have some negative impacts on our communication skill.
On the one hand, there are a variety of benefits why people are still using these high-tech devices. One reason is that technology makes people get closer easily because they can keep in touch with someone who lives far away quickly. For example, with the invention of the Internet, people can contact to their friends and family from another countries. They therefore could save a great deal of time and money by doing this. Furthermore, a lot of devices now have Skype and they could go their business with partners by this application. Instead of wasting several weeks to wait the information from the other party in order to finish a project, it is much easier to stay at work place, working online before a big screen and have done all the work.
On the other hand, it seems to me that people are more dependent on technology nowadays and I believe this is an essential part of decreasing people’s communication skill. Firstly, because of paying serious attention to the cell phones and computers in order to make friends and send messages instead of speaking, they will not want to say to another person anymore. This may let people stay inside almost day due to they do not adore the outdoor life. Secondly, although conservational flow plays crucial roles in our family in order to build relationship, young people would like to play video games and chatting with someone they do not even know and maybe dangerous as criminal while parents would like to watch television and use table to update breaking news. They live in a house without talking face to face. In some cases, this could make them forget how to express and share their feeling to others.
In conclusion, although technology brings some pro to people, it is true that if they spend a large part of our daily life making conversation with friends by mobile phones and working with computers, the capacity to communicate directly in social life will be influenced badly
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | Hai Anh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Uppal singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | binhan_04 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | DIPAN PATIDAR | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Anna Trieu | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries will not be needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
It true that mobile phones and computers play a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82010582011 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53706324365 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3306725981 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.466666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177511629259 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616805923996 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517903310973 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984237096589 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570385640411 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.