The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)
The graph gives information about the average amount of unpaid work in hours per week done by married men and women in different segments.
Looking from an overall perspective, married women in all categories spent more time a week doing unpaid work when compared with men.
As the chart portrays, 30 hours a week was the time frame for women with no child to take part in unpaid work, while men in the same section spent less than 19 hours doing such a job. Whereas there was a significant variation when having 1-2 offspring, married women invested somewhat more time at 50 hours. This number continued to rise by 10 hours in women who possessed three-plus children. That showed more time on doing unpaid work for women was the consequence of having more children.
Interestingly, the number of unpaid work hours, which men involved were not affected by the increase of their offspring. To be precise, an equal hour spent by men with no child and had 1-2 children for unpaid work, the number even showed a drop in men with more than three kids. It appears that raising children was the women's duty, but not for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | Ducc Minh | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | beauty flowers | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 78
- the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 95
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66161616162 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37206582023 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3647999626 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244460639574 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119768167169 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955213959308 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19138246374 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750400244489 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.