The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The column graph illustrates the differences and changes in the proportion of people who went to cinemas in a European country on different days in three years from 2003 to 2007. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the percentage of viewers at weekends outnumbered that on weekdays in all surveyed years. Noticeably, the numbers of movie watchers on Saturday ranked the top theatre market.
In particular, when it comes to the percentage of people going to cinemas between Monday and Thursday, the figures on Tuesday dominated the numbers of attendance at about 20%, 17%, 19% in 2 003, 2005, 2007 respectively. Besides, regarding Wednesday, the graph witnessed a dramatic decrease from over 15% to roughly 8% in the figure of viewers, which accounted for the lowest score in 2007.
Concerning three days at weekends, the number of citizens going to theatre on Friday remained stable at 30% over the period; while nearly half of movie watchers went to the cinemas on Saturday, which constantly constituted the highest number. In terms of Sunday, the figure grew from 30% to nearly 35% before dropping to around 32% in 2007.
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 70
- More and more plastic waste has polluted cities countrysides and oceans What problems does it cause and what measures can be taken 78
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 67
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68792828192 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6140446914 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231952999364 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973716055948 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111179960916 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15504174208 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878352312168 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.