Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between men and women.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Women once rarely worked outside of the home in the past, so it was they who undertook almost all household responsibilities. However, as time changes, they now secure a full-time job in today’s society and probably work just as hard has their husbands do. This has led to a belief that housework should be evenly divided between the marriage partners. Although this proposition seems to be reasonable, it is problematic in certain common cases.
There are clearly several benefits to men sharing household chores with their wives equally. Family breakdown usually results in men refusing to do or unwilling to share housework with their spouses. Therefore, on a familial level, unnecessary quarrels over this matter can be avoided, thus stronger bonds within the family can be facilitated by such arrangement. Besides, on a societal level, gender equity would be enormously promoted when males in charge of 50% of the house tasks. Living in the modern community, there should be the existence of both sexes’ participation in nearly all facets, and housework sharing is not the exception. This argument sounds ostensibly convincing and mostly used by advocates of women’s rights.
Admirable as this suggestion may appear to be, it does not work in some situations. Consider this case as an example: a family where one has a longer and busier work routine than that of the other; an officer husband going on frequent business trips is often distant from home. It is likely that all household chores need undertaking by his wife. Similarly, if a doctor husband has to work significantly long hours, for instance, 14 hours a day in the hospital, then there is no way that his wife takes care of only half of the housework. In those circumstances, the idea of sharing chores in an equal fashion is actually unfair. The housework should otherwise be separated in accordance with each partner’s schedule instead of being rigidly half-split-per-person.
In conclusion, it may sound sensible that men share 50% of household chores with their wives; nevertheless, this view would pose some problems to the family in certain cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 90 | view |
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below describe an area before and after the construction of a hydroelectric power plant Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 80
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 95
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an equal fashion" with adverb for "equal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rcumstances, the idea of sharing chores in an equal fashion is actually unfair. The housework shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13505747126 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96755894031 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2420808456 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.117647059 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175259330241 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573372595292 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452449842915 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114679509633 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452558960641 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.