The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target, and the number of complaints and passengers.
The bar charts provided depict the percentage of services ariving on time of a bus firm and the number of complaints over a period of 5 years from 1999 to 2003.
Overall, it is evident that the punctuality of the bus business from 1999 to 2003 witnessed a downward trend after a period surveyed, whereas the opposite was true of the quantity of complaints.
As can be seen from the bar charts given, the proportion of targeted bus services ariving on time was always higher compared to the actual figure betwee 1999 and 2002. The portion of targeted figure showed a stability from 1999 to 2000 and from 2001 to 2002, which was at about 86% and 85%, respectively, before slightly decreasing to almost 84.5% in 2003. There was a dramatic fluctuation of the actual figure, which minimally rose to merely 85% in 2003 and was higher compared to the targeted figure.
As far as the bar charts are concerned, the number of complaints showed an enormous fluctuation between 1999 and 2003. The figure witnessed a surge to approximately 100 complaints per thousand passenger's journeys from 1999 to 2000 and then it plummeted to about 80 complaints in 2001. Between 2001 and 2003, the figure gradually leapt to almost 120 complaints per thousand passenger's journeys.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-21 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-16 | carrodsk2 | view | |
| 2019-04-17 | Tracy Nguyen | 57 | view |
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 59
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 100
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar charts provided depict the perce...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a period of 5 years from 1999 to 2003. Overall, it is evident that the punctual...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as true of the quantity of complaints. As can be seen from the bar charts given...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'charts'' or 'chart's'?
Suggestion: charts'; chart's
...ints. As can be seen from the bar charts given, the proportion of targeted bus s...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igher compared to the targeted figure. As far as the bar charts are concerned, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85581395349 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70970053965 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6222706122 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208313415663 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101985811815 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412151885535 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125387811424 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394907670263 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.