The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002
The table illustrates the proportion of national expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of items in 2002.
Overall, all countries spent most on food, drinks and tobacco, which was almost three times that of the other items. The lowest expenditure was on leisure and education in the five countries. The expenditure of Turkey overall was higher than the other countries.
In terms of food, drinks and tobacco, Turkey spent the most at 32.14%. The expenditure of Ireland was also high (28.91%) compared to Sweden which spent the least (15.77%). Spain and Italy spent 18.80% and 16.36% respectively.
Italy spent more than the other countries on clothing and footwear (9%) as opposed to the lowest expenditure which could be seen in Sweden at 5.40%. The other three countries spent on average around 6.5%.
The lowest expenditure was on leisure and education which accounted for under 5% in all countries. Turkey spent most on these items at just 4.35% of their national expenditure which is around double that of Spain which spent the least at just 1.98%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-14 | alexandra2101 | view | |
| 2021-12-26 | bhavybha | view | |
| 2021-09-24 | Nimasha | 81 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | Nimasha | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | minhngoc_8 | 67 | view |
- You work in an office where you sit and do your work the whole day You are worried about the effect of this on your health Write a letter to your manager In your letter Explain how sitting always is affecting your health Suggest changes the company can ma 73
- The number of companies that sell their products all over the world is increasing Does this development have more advantage or disadvantage 63
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only for their own heath but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your opinion. 89
- You have seen an advertisement for a parttime volunteer to work with out pay for an organisation that helps local children You would like to do this work Write a letter to the head of the organisation In your letter Say why you are interested in this type 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10555555556 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51329182597 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7513005881 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5454545455 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119069112278 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554644286793 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633302186021 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903867268445 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776615705946 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.