In this past, people used their free time in better ways as today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Indeed, with the fast pace of time, people experience many new alterations in their life.In earlier time, masses did not have well developed equipment, from where they could enhance their overall character. However, these days multifarious things are accessible in terms of utilizing their time on valuable activities. So, in this essay, I largely discord with the notion that in pervious time people spent their time in a good way.
Commencing with the most salient fact why umpteenth people ponder that conventional time is appropriate for utilizing on important issues instead nowadays. First and foremost is, in old times people not only had strong relationships, but also observe the beauty of ethics along with moral values, which seems an uphill task in modern lifestyle. To explain it, most of time people spent their time with their grand parents as well as neighbours. Due to this fact, they could easily socialize with anyone, which gives a sense of maturity.
However, in this modern era, people have many stuffs, from where they can either develop their personality through the access of online classes or try their hobbies in their spare time. In other words, due to having burden of work, whether regarding to educational field or official domain, people always want some leisure time for enjoying their life. In this way, they join personality development classes, such as learning the new way of making food. As a result, nowadays, people have more knowledge to pass their time on key elements. Another reason is that reading books. Which was hardly found in earlier time, because now many people include it in their status-que because it gives a great knowledge and sharps our cognitive skills. Consequently, these days and age, people give preference to read books.
In conclusion, although the importance of earlier time cannot be overlooked as it gives a sense of sharing experience, these days people have several kind of stuffs for spending their precious time on use useful activities rathar than waste time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | deep979kaur | 84 | view |
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Do children behave better when they are physically punished or rewarded 89
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extend do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 61
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays them in the past Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think it is not necessary for adults to receive education in class Self study is a good way for them to study more effectively To what extend do You agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ence many new alterations in their life.In earlier time, masses did not have well ...
^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... valuable activities. So, in this essay, I largely discord with the notion that i...
^^
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ommencing with the most salient fact why umpteenth people ponder that conventiona...
^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'several kinds'.
Suggestion: several kinds
...ring experience, these days people have several kind of stuffs for spending their precious t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13253012048 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52913778966 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6607182451 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266190674201 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103217510128 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600491147822 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183523539772 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310598046611 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.