The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustrations depict a process in which plastic bottles are recycled
Overall, there are 9 stages in this cyclical procedure, starting with rubbish being disposed to a right bin and ending with creating new products
To begin with, plastic bottles are discharged in a designated bin for recycling, prior to being delivered to the recycling center by a truck. Then they are separated by hand and the selected ones undergo a stage of compression which pressed the bottles into cubes
In the next step, the blocks are shredded into small pieces by 2 dics, then they are cleaned in a water tank to remove residue. The material is poured into a machine to make plastic pellets which are melted from the heat underneath to transform into raw material. Finally, they are utilized to manufacture new items, some of which are recyclable and when they are thrown away, the same process begins again
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- a new generation of entrepreneurs believe that privately funded space tourism will be the next exciting development in space exploration How true do you think this is How would space tourism affect space exploration as we know it today 95
- the table below shows the amount of waste production in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56342671237 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.3302046006 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.0 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147750926787 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769095443837 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417137337441 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109785793376 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850507344041 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.