The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005.
The table compares the percentage of expenditure for 4 conventional items from income of adults and childrens in UK in 2005
Overall, while food was mostly bought by adults, children spent a majority of their income on music. Excepting electronic equipment, there were nearly similar expenditures for others between boys and girls
With regards to food, this was mostly purchased by adults with 25% of their income spending on these including 14% of men and 39% of women. In sharp contrast, kids’ expenses for this item was relatively lower with only 10%. While the portion of videos bought by adults was merely 1%, these were allocated to a majority of children’s expenditure with the figure of 12% comprising 18% and 17% of boys and girls repectively.
As far as electronic equipment and music are concerned, there was the same proportion of the adults choosing to buy them, which was 5%. However, while there was the same figure of 5% for both men and women paying for music, the other was seen with a huge difference between 2 genders when the figure for men was 9% higher than that of women. With respect to children, music was their main puporse of their expenditure with the figure of 39% comprising 38% and 40% of boys and girls respectively
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people suggest that social networking and online communication have increased social isolation In what ways do you think this has happened Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at 61
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8287037037 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61904085497 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1563583304 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138151386797 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805519747835 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938895446417 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130860886664 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10125152596 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.