The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
The bar chart compares the percentage of five different post-school qualifications based on gender in Australia in 1999. Overall, men achieved more skilled vocational diplomas, masters degrees, and postgraduate diplomas than females while the opposite was true for two other kinds of qualifications.
According to skilled vocational diploma, females accounted for just 10%, which is the lowest percentage among 5 levels of school qualifications. In contrast, this figure in males stood at the highest position, at 90%. Australian females achieved 40% of masters degree while this proportion in males was higher than 20%. There is a significant difference in the figure for postgraduate diplomas achieved based on gender. 70% of this qualification got by the male while this percentage in female just accounted for 40%.
Turning to two other qualifications, 50% of bachelor’s degree was got by the female while this percentage in male was lower by 5%. Interestingly, the percentage of undergraduate diplomas in males was twice as much as that in females, at 70% and 35% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | alpha2006sh | view | |
| 2023-10-12 | alpha2006sh | 90 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Efuli | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | Gulmiraa | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-14 | roopdeep | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- With students returning to schools coinciding with the beginning of the rainy season in central Vietnam people have suggested that it might be convenient to continue studying online until the rainy season has finished Discuss the advantages and disadvanta 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44378698225 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30037509287 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5070613018 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11263326772 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590957960993 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960854168135 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919113481064 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873662570477 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.