The expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens
The pie charts give the information about how much the Americans spent on their livings in two different years, 1966 and 1996. They divided the expenditures into 7 categories. Overall, it can be seen that their expenses in food dropped, however, they spent more money on cars.
To begin with, people in the USA spent the highest amount of money on food in 1966, at 44%, while in 1996 that figure decreased to only about a quarter. 6% of the American expenses, which was accounted for books, also declined during the 30-year period, to only 1%.
On the other hand, the spending on cars saw a significant rise, from approximately one fourth in 1966 to slightly under a half in 1996, becoming the largest proportion of the expenditures. There was also a considerable increase in computers, which jumped from 1% in 1966 to one tenth in 1996. Similarly, the Americans used more money for restaurants, the figure from the 30-year earlier grew two times higher to 14% in 1996.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-25 | aikzat | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | tan1234 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Sanaullah97 | 91 | view |
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 60
- the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 73
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 56
- The comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77514792899 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64852229643 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.311225509 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249330034633 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09571888702 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658199210375 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157145670603 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335435646722 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.