One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People’s opinions diverge regarding how to reduce tremendous devastating impacts on the environment. While there are some controversial issues that the government should enact a policy to increase the expense of the resources used for transportation, I would argue that we can implement other alternatives.
To begin with, I agree that it is beneficial when raising the fuel expenditure that is needed to run a car. Firstly, individuals might be anxious about the great amount of money they have to spend on buying necessary fuels such as gasoline, petroleum, therefore residents might carefully consider whether they should possess and use their own vehicles. As a result, people will be more inclined to utilize transportations such as bicycles or vehicles which are friendly with the environment. If the government does not enact a policy related to the materials cost, individuals might become more indifferent or even ignore urgent environmental problems.
However, I believe that there are many alternative options that bring more benefits than increasing the prices of fuel. The first one is that the government should launch more campaigns or propagate on social media, news to enhance people’s perception about reducing the considerable number of transportations on-road and alarm about the serious impacts on our physical and intellectual health. In addition, countries can encourage manufacturers to produce a means of transportation that utilizes electronic, solar energy. This might assist to diminish the large number of emissions affected on habitat such as dust, carbon dioxide, etc.
In conclusion, it seems to me that we can implement numerous other practices to protect our environment instead of raising the prices of resources needed for gasoline engine vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Does the advantage of this for individuals outweigh the disadvantage for the environment 89
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision making process too Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The Internet contains a lot of information However sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 95
- Forests are the lungs of the earth Destruction of the world s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bitat such as dust, carbon dioxide, etc. In conclusion, it seems to me that we ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56934306569 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11249469212 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0750677498 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133231251418 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480153235288 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346044173176 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733969230327 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262840443423 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.