The map below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures depict the information about how the layout of the University Sports courts has been changing from 1990 when it was first constructed to the current time. From an overall perspective, it is apparent that the center had experienced extensive changes in various places such as park and parking area and new development is also seen in several places such as Basketball and Tennis courts and fitness center.
Regarding the first picture, the initial layout consisted of a park and car park on the west side of the complex and other sports facilities such as tennis courts, outdoor pool, and changing room on the east side. Additionally, places such as café and reception centers were located between the park and the outdoor pool.
Moving to the second picture, in the present time, the center has undergone major redevelopment in many areas. First of all, the park is demolished and a Basketball court is constructed on the west side of the complex. Beyond the court it was previously a parking lot, however, in the present time, the place is replaced with four outdoor tennis courts. The location in which two outdoor tennis courts were situated in 1990, the new fitness center is built along with changing room which is extended and relocated to the east side of the center. Conversely, no change was seen in the café, front desk area, and outdoor pool for more than two decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The table gives information about department and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting while but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Tennis courts and fitness center. Regarding the first picture, the initial...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, regarding, second, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88655462185 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51370440523 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512605042017 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.668372291 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713941622378 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354938087945 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463816820797 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554165054864 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351445502466 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.