The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram illustrates, the development of the science Park from 2008 to today. Overall, the major modifications were done on the upper portion of the map on the northwest side, and the opening of the new cycle path.
In 2008, the science park was occupied with more greenery than today with plenty of grasslands, and woodland on a given map. Other than the office and reception, there were only three centres such as business units, IT centre and cyber security. Similarly, there was a car parking area in the middle to reach from three centres. A road transportation facility was also available which is interconnected from north to east and west. Furthermore, there was a railway line in the south region.
However, dramatic changes happened in today's science park over the years. The new research and development building was built on the Freeland covered with grass and woodlands. Office and business units were kept in the same area though, the reception was replaced to the University hub. Moreover, they built a new cycle path along with the road, and bus station on the east side and a railway station on the south. Likewise, the IT centre moved to the innovation centre and there is a common path connected to each building through the car parking area. Cyber security block was recently extended to the upper side, after the clearance of some grassland in the southeast corner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006, 2007 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below show the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2000 67
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...hree centres such as business units, IT centre and cyber security. Similarly, there wa...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...railway station on the south. Likewise, the IT centre moved to the innovation centre a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
... station on the south. Likewise, the IT centre moved to the innovation centre and ther...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60107374023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546610169492 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6674929229 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.2307692308 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15051560388 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617701417133 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818807721673 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12075650229 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340376086301 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.