The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The first bar chart compares the change in computer ownerships from 2002 to 2010 and the second one shows the difference based on different educational levels between 2002 and 2010.
Overall, it is obvious to see increasing people who owned computers from 2002 to 2010, while a narrowing gap between percentages of lower educational level and higher one can be noticed.
Looking at the first image, there is a steady growth rate (approximately 2%) for every two years in terms of computer ownership in the 8-year time, rising from 58% in 2002 to 69% in 2010.
According to the second graph, an increasing number of people from all levels of education had computers during this time period, while the change for those who had no high school diploma rose the most, from 15% in 2002 to 42% in 2010.
More customers for computers were with high school graduate or incomplete college, with the increase of about 30%, from 35% to 65% and 55% to 85% respectively. A significant amount of people who had higher education purchased computers, with slight rises from 65% to 85% for undergraduates and 70% to 90% for postgraduates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- 7 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- 4 The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologist in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- 8 The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91145833333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72514314577 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.7549097263 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 157.166666667 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386487571072 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202433264411 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104881914957 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232301724744 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894495160521 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.