The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the number of girls per 100 boys signed in three types of school education between 1990 and 1998.
Overall, both developing and developed countries increase the number of girls in all three types of schools and only developed countries are able to reach the target of 100 girls.
First of all, girls who studied primary education in developing countries were about 83 per 100 boys in 1990 then rose a bit by 4 in the next 8 years. Secondly, there were 72 girls per 100 boys in secondary education in 1998 before increasing slightly to 82 girls in 1998. Thirdly, the number of girls who enrolled in Tertiary education was the lowest, which was about 66 girls in 1990 and there was a growth to 75 girls per 100 boys signed in Tertiary education in 1998.
Similarly, both primary education and secondary school had the number of girls enrolled to 95 and 98 respectively. There was a rise in both these two types of educations, however, the number of girls in secondary school was higher than those in primary education by 3 in 1998. Lastly, Tertiary education was the only type of education having the highest number of girls and passing through the target by 5 in 1990 and 12 in 1998.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2022-04-05 | Geegeepay | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Geegeepay | 56 | view |
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measures could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- Time spent on smartphones and tablets by category 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, then, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61860465116 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50578994215 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423255813953 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2035015557 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268633479442 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155525234345 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592822409725 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192965255576 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723673393732 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.