The charts show below what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The given bar charts depict what UK bachelor and alumni did after completing tertiary education in 2008. The number of pupils who opted for a full-time job did not have any data. Overall, it is clear that both Britain graduates and postgraduates continue to study account for the lion’s share of the bar, while spontaneous work in two bars is virtually negligible.
According to the charts, the number of graduated scholars who went back to school for a higher study had a slight majority compared to this kind of work in the second bar chart, receiving 29665 learners, while the figure for alumni who continue their studies was significantly lower, at 2725 students. Furthermore, 16235 school-leavers were jobless, as opposed to the former, who received 1625 students.
On the other hand, university graduates who employed non-compensated employment, each constituting 3500 of the learner force, were just a shade higher than the others. In addition, former schoolers in doing temporary labor were lower on Bachelor, at 15200 scholars more low-pitched.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk in two bars is virtually negligible. According to the charts, the number of g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...rmer schoolers in doing temporary labor were lower on Bachelor, at 15200 scholars mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, while, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27218934911 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92361588592 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698224852071 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9123616293 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215612650741 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978331450822 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837119336828 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136271699212 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107239993705 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.