Should students use smart phone in class or not? What do you think about this issue?
In present-day society, the explosion of technology has changed almost all aspects of life, especially in education, where students and teachers can use smart techniques and computers in studying and educating. While some opinions assume that smartphones help students’ performances more efficiently, the others argue this thought and give counterarguments about it.
On the one hand, using smartphones has a lot of benefits for students in class. This is because they can cut down on school supplies thanks to the phone utilities such as noting, calculating and so on; therefore; it is possible for them to find and revise easily. For example, when students want to take notes, they might need pens, note papers, highlighters to do their favor. However, if there has a phone, they just open the note app available, then they could execute all the commands in one app only. As a result, students are not necessary to bring a number of school things and feel more relaxed when going to school. If there are no smartphones, attending classes with a heavy bag is able to be harmful to school students’ shoulders.
On the other hand, disadvantages due to this kind of high-tech equipment have caused many troubles for parents and schools. Since the technology developed, people have decided to use smartphones in school, especially for students. This makes adults feel difficult to manage what will their children use it for because they can not supervise all the time. So, some toxic content will be watched and followed by students. One more thing is that using smartphones in school might make students unequal with each other because there is someone who uses modern smartphones while the others are not. Therefore, students do not feel good when they attend school.
In short, using smartphones has lots of advantages namely doing more things in one app, helping the students’ bag lighter, there are some disadvantages if they use it in the wrong ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in short, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07098765432 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77248295092 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2124467666 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225189673288 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078180307386 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422028020693 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143991576875 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00837589913125 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.