Prevent birds from hitting the glass
Both the lecture and the passage discuss if there will be a solution to make a change in the existing glass, which is broadly used in modern architecture, in order to avoid birds from flying into it and getting injured. The author proposes three possible solutions and believes these can prevent birds from damage. While, on the other hand, the professor disputes suggested methods and finds them ineffective. He asserts his objection and explains respectively.
First, the author highlights, one solution is to replace regular glass with one-Way glass. This way, not only people can see outside through the window, but also birds assume the glass as a barrier and won't fly into it. But the lecturer disputes the idea and claims that one-way glass serves as a mirror. He says that mirrors are as bad as regular glass since birds are not able to figure out and they still will fly into it.
Second, according to the passage, it suggested that colorful glass can be helpful replacement for regular one for prevention of damage to birds. On the contrary, the professor thinks the opening which people can see out through it, are looking like holes in birds view and they would like to cross through the holes. Maybe making the holes smaller prevent them, but instead, this reduces the light inside the room. Hence, he doesn’t count this idea as a solution.
Third and last, the author names magnetic fields as a possible solution for the mentioned issue. Despite the assertion made in the passage, the lecturer contradicts the idea and explains that birds make use of magnetic fields only in their long-distance navigation. For instance, when they are heading to a warm country from a cold one. But they don't use it for short distances. Instead, they use their eyes and lights for such a distance. Therefore, this solution also cannot be effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-03 | Amirbagherian16 | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | neha_1217 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | nagy | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... warm country from a cold one. But they dont use it for short distances. Instead, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88253968254 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44207264856 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536507936508 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.574794914 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245819218387 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694002521016 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070395387516 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153371559619 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699498599446 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.