The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
The map illustrates the differences in a construction of a small theater between 2010 and 2012. Overall, there has been an expansion in the size of the theater and the infrastructure has considerable changes due to new introductions and relocation of many areas .
Starting with the layout of the theater in 2010. There was a café in the right -hand side of the main entrain and in the left-hand side were a ticket and an admin office. Moreover, the large stage which was on the top of the main area was located between a media and an auditorium.
Moving to 2012, the café was replaced by a ticket office while its previous area was a location of a new restaurant. Other major changes including the expansion of the stage, the appearance of a new hall behind the stage, a relocation of the media from the back of the stage to the left with showers and the storage zone from the left to the right, however the auditorium remained unchanged during the period shown.
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 78
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...troductions and relocation of many areas . Starting with the layout of the theate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60115606936 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70930536842 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5424353412 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172927326159 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105329073258 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117425166142 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139283994361 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116415742354 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.