Company should use public recognition, not money to reward
hard working.
It is a highly debated issue that whether company should use public recognition rather than money to reward hard working, and this topic can be approached from several angles due to its complexity. While some people tend to think that public recognition can make company have positive image, others seem to disagree with it. Deeply deliberating over the issue, I believe that using public recognition is a better way to reward hard working, and the following discussion reveals my stand and understanding.
To begin with, company cares budget and rewarding diligent workers through money may make the budget out of control. That is to say, giving money to employees as presents will produce higher cost and then lead to less profit to the company. For example, Taiwan First Bank, a well-known financial institution in Taiwan, has a hard situation in finance since the company encourages hard working all by money.
Secondly, it is important for employer to have positive reputation in society and using public recognition as reward is a better approach to build good image. To further elaborate, when an employer calculates the value of hard working by public recognition rather than money, people will deem him or her as a pioneer. For instance, Dr. Wu, a popular make-up company in Taipei, usually reward workers by public recognition and people maintain Dr. Wu as a special company since this behavior is a brand-new way to reward hard working.
Last but not least, workers take achievement as the first priority to consider whether to work for the same company or not and public recognition can surely create huge achievement than money. Take my father for example. In the past, my dad only worked for three months in his previous position which produced high salary but low recognition. On the contrary, now, he works for a company which can make him gain full of recognition from others over ten years. Although the salary is not as high as before, he is willing to stay for longer.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think that rewarding hard working by public recognition is the best for a company. That is not to say, of course, that other points of view are completely without merit. However, I think the reasons I provided in foavor of my opinion are stronger.
- Which of the following resources is most effective for employers to know about applicants for a position 1 contact the applicant s former employer 2 check the applicant s online profile and social platform 3 provide internship for a month 91
- Some companies decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending mails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great Others believe that this policy will discourage employees What is your opinion and why 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students aging 15 18 with same skill levels of certain subjects should be included in the same class 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 76
- Imagine that you own a company and that you are interviewing people who applied for a job at the company Three candidates applied for the job Which ONE of the three candidates below would you choose to work at your company Why would the candidate be the b 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in foavor of my opinion are stronger.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, of course, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92010309278 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61897649651 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8996933481 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511668216452 0.236089414692 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147935094695 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113635261396 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284198444298 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110898742409 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.